This draft cycle gave us more than just basketball — it gave us drama, storylines, and a potential redemption arc for the Chicago Sky.
The Hailey Van Lith–Angel Reese Reunion: Real Chemistry or Just Good PR?
Let’s be honest — when Van Lith said “Oh, I love that energy,” it felt like one of those “smile through your teeth” kind of answers. Not necessarily fake, but maybe… strategic. But then again, Hailey has shown time and time again that she’s no puppet — she speaks when it counts. And if she’s doubling down on her praise of Reese, even after a turbulent LSU run, then maybe there is more trust there than we give credit for.
The problem is — we’ve seen the dysfunction before. That LSU team didn’t combust, but it sure flickered. And with Jason Whitlock trying to stir the pot, the outside noise isn’t going away anytime soon.
But maybe… that’s exactly what makes this work.
Here’s Why This Could Actually Be a Power Combo:
They’ve Been Through the Fire: They’ve already clashed in a high-pressure, high-ego environment. That kind of experience could build resilience — or at least a shared understanding of how not to repeat past mistakes.
Complementary Games: Reese dominates the paint. Van Lith brings court vision and perimeter punch. If they buy in and sync up, defenses are going to have a real problem.
Chicago’s Structure Might Help: The Sky aren’t LSU. They’ve got pros, vets, and coaching that might actually welcome a little fire — as long as it fuels wins.
Still, There Are Real Risks:
Old Friction Could Resurface: Competitive egos don’t just disappear, and if either player struggles to find their role early, things could get tense.
Media Heat: With analysts like Whitlock already spinning narratives, every quote, glance, or missed assist will be overanalyzed.
—
Bottom Line:
This reunion is a gamble — but it’s the kind that could redefine the Sky’s trajectory if the chemistry clicks. Reese brings the power. Van Lith brings the poise. Together? It’s either fireworks or a flameout.
What’s your call— fire duo or disaster in disguise?