The 2008 Arnold Palmer Invitational became a notable event not for the golf itself but for the controversy surrounding John Daly and his disqualification. Daly, who was supposed to participate in the Pro-Am, claimed he was given the wrong tee time, leading to a cascade of issues that frustrated everyone involved.
According to Nick O’Hern, one of the alternates for the Pro-Am, the debacle stemmed from a mix of miscommunication and Daly’s actions. Speaking on the Talk Birdie to Me podcast, O’Hern revealed the confusion over tee times. He stated that the locker room information indicated he was scheduled for the morning, but he was unaware. However, O’Hern didn’t shy away from criticizing Daly, suggesting that Daly missed his tee time due to an alleged “bender.” He remarked that Daly was supposed to play the morning Pro-Am but failed to show up, creating a messy situation for everyone.
Daly’s absence resulted in disqualification for him and two alternates, including O’Hern. The incident reignited discussions about Daly’s off-course behavior and its impact on his career. His former coach, Butch Harmon, had previously spoken about Daly’s lack of commitment to golf, bluntly stating that Daly prioritized drinking over his game. This harsh criticism reflected broader concerns about Daly’s ability to manage his professional responsibilities.
Despite the backlash, Daly defended himself, claiming he was trying to promote the tournament by making an appearance at a Hooters tent. He shared that he had signed numerous hats, enjoyed some beers, and indulged in chicken wings, emphasizing that he wasn’t even playing in the Pro-Am at the time of the incident. Frustrated by the blame directed at him, Daly remarked, “No matter what I do, it’s wrong.” He also hinted at the toll his personal struggles and injuries had taken on his career, dating back to a rib injury in 2005.
The controversy highlighted a recurring theme in Daly’s career—his off-course behavior overshadowing his talent and contributions to golf. The incident left fans and critics divided on whether Daly deserved the blame or if he was merely a scapegoat in a larger organizational mishap. Ultimately, it became another chapter in Daly’s tumultuous journey, marked by moments of brilliance and controversy.