High Limit Racing, co-owned by Kyle Larson and Brad Sweet, is under scrutiny following serious allegations of malpractice raised by former employee Kevin Nouse. Serving as the series’ technical director for seven months before his dismissal on June 17, 2024, Nouse has publicly criticized the integrity of the competition. His claims, which surfaced on social media, have sparked significant debate within the motorsports community.
Nouse alleges that High Limit Racing failed to enforce its own rules, citing specific instances where violations were overlooked. He claims he discovered a 1.25-inch wicker bill on a car’s top wing and an engine with two crank triggers—both against regulations—but was told by series director Mike Hess to dismiss these issues. Furthermore, Nouse reported confiscating an MSD box from a team, only to be told he could not investigate it further. These incidents, according to Nouse, undermine the fairness of the competition.
In his defense, Nouse stated, “It’s about integrity. I want a level playing field for fans, drivers, and officials.” However, critics suggest his public airing of grievances might be driven by personal dissatisfaction following his dismissal. High Limit Racing has denied these allegations, issuing a statement emphasizing their commitment to fair competition and dismissing Nouse’s claims as baseless.
— Kevin Nouse (@KevinNouse) June 17, 2024
Despite the controversy, High Limit Racing continues to grow, hosting its first international event in Perth, Australia, and unveiling a 60-race calendar for 2025. Larson expressed enthusiasm for the series’ global expansion, highlighting its focus on improving sprint car racing.
Nouse’s actions have undoubtedly stirred controversy. Some view his revelations as a step towards transparency in motorsports, while others see them as the actions of a disgruntled former employee. The true impact of these allegations on High Limit Racing’s reputation remains to be seen.
Do you think these claims highlight systemic issues in High Limit Racing, or are they a reflection of personal grievances?