The 2024 Heisman Trophy race was one for the ages, delivering drama, stats, and chaos that rivaled a soap opera. Ultimately, Colorado’s Travis Hunter emerged as the winner, solidifying his place in history as a rare and remarkable two-way player. However, the path to his victory was filled with fierce competition. Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty tore through defenses with Barry Sanders-esque performances, racking up over 2,500 rushing yards and 29 touchdowns. Cam Ward and Dillon Gabriel also put up impressive numbers, securing their places as finalists.
The biggest surprise of the season, though, came from Indiana Hoosiers quarterback Kurtis Rourke. Despite solid stats—2,820 passing yards, 27 touchdowns, and only four interceptions—his inclusion among Heisman voters’ top picks shocked fans and analysts alike. Rourke received actual Heisman votes, including two first-place votes and three for second place. The outrage wasn’t so much about Rourke as a player but rather what his inclusion revealed about the flaws in the Heisman voting process.
The Hoosiers, led by head coach Curt Cignetti, entered Week 13 with a 10-0 record but were thoroughly dismantled by Ohio State in a 38-15 defeat. During this game, Rourke struggled significantly, throwing for only 68 yards with no touchdowns and recording -33 rushing yards. This performance on national television starkly contrasted with the elite Heisman-level play seen from other candidates.
Full Heisman voting. pic.twitter.com/Oou8D7FgQh
— Ralph D. Russo (@ralphDrussoATH) December 15, 2024
The backlash was swift and widespread. Fans, analysts, and social media commentators united in questioning how Rourke received Heisman consideration. Critics pointed to the strength of Indiana’s schedule, which featured weaker opponents, as a reason his stats were inflated. Many argued that voting for Rourke undermined the legitimacy of the award. Social media was ablaze with incredulous reactions, with some calling the voting process a “joke” and demanding an overhaul.
The broader frustration centered on the Heisman voting system itself. While Rourke’s performance was commendable in certain games, his inclusion exposed potential biases and inconsistencies among voters. Critics suggested that media members, some of whom may lack deep football expertise, shouldn’t hold so much influence over such a prestigious award. Many called for voting rights to be extended to those directly involved in football, such as coaches, former players, or even current players, to ensure a more credible selection process.
Meanwhile, Travis Hunter’s historic season stood in sharp contrast. Hunter dominated as a two-way player, amassing over 1,150 receiving yards and 14 touchdowns while also excelling on defense. Jeanty’s 29 rushing touchdowns and Cam Ward’s 36 passing touchdowns further highlighted the incredible competition in this year’s race.
The Heisman controversy surrounding Rourke wasn’t just about one player—it was a call to reform the system. Until changes are made, moments like these are bound to fuel debate and frustration, as fans demand a process that better reflects the essence of college football excellence.